We will use your email address only for sending you newsletters. Please see our Privacy Notice for details of your data protection rights.
The Queen, 94, has been self-isolating at Windsor Castle with Prince Philip, 99, since March but left the lockdown on July 17 to attend Princess Beatrice’s wedding and knight Captain Sir Tom Moore. But the national hero is said to have declined to have tea with the Monarch, according to ITV’s Royal correspondent Chris Ship. The Queen offered to host tea after the small ceremony but Sir Tom already had plans with his family.
Speaking on ITV’s Royal Rota, Mr Ship said: “When the car came to pick him up and take him away for tea, it transpired that the Queen had actually offered to host tea for him.
“But being the gentleman that he is he said, ‘sorry, I’ve already got plans’ and went to the hotel down the road with his family.
“He basically said ‘no thanks’ to the Queen and there’s not many people who would say that.”
The revelation comes as the unofficial biography of Meghan Markle and Prince Harry has been released.
The book, Finding Freedom by authors Omid Scobie and Carolyn Durand claimed the Queen found a website designed to clarify the couple’s future “hurtful”.
Serialised in The Times and Sunday Times, the couple were said to be forced to take action after a story broke that they were going to stay in Canada permanently.
Authors wrote that a a royal source denied leaking the story, instead blaming the couple “because they were frustrated at the palace in the talks that were going on… They wanted to force the decision, to break it open.”
The couple deny this claim, The Times reports.
On January 8, Harry and Meghan used their Instagram page to share the news of their future plans and launched the website sussexroyal.com.
The book’s authors write: “It offered clarity on their decision to be financially independent, which was not only to have more freedom in their work but to remove the tabloids’ justification in having access to their lives.
The website took everyone by surprise, the authors write.
“Aides and family members knew the couple wanted to step back, but the website, which laid out the details of their half-in-half-out model as if it were a done deal, put the Queen in a difficult position.”
Meghan Markle ‘nightmare’: Duchess facing crisis in LA over privacy [INSIGHT]
Princess Beatrice breaks tradition with Royal Family wedding first [ANALYSIS]
Queen in ‘war of words’ with Meghan Markle and Prince Harry [VIDEO]
Buckingham Palace put out a short statement 15 minutes after the Sussexes made theirs, but aides including the Queen’s private secretary were “furious”.
And there was significant reaction from fellow royals, with a source saying the Queen and the Duke of Edinburgh were “devastated”.
A senior member of the household was quoted in the book as saying: “The element of surprise, the blindsiding of the Queen, for the other principals who are all very mindful of this, rightfully, it was deeply unsettling.
“The family is very private and bringing it into the public domain, when they were told not to, hurt the Queen.
“It was laying out what the Sussexes wanted in a statement without consulting with Her Majesty first – and she’s the head of the institution.”
Source: Read Full Article